% -*-latex-*-
% Document name: /u/sy/beebe/tex/errata/j-hahn-errata.ltx
% Creator: Nelson H. F. Beebe [beebe@magna.math.utah.edu]
% Creation Date: Tue Oct 15 17:31:55 1991

%%% ====================================================================
%%%  @LaTeX-file{
%%%     author          = "Nelson H. F. Beebe",
%%%     version         = "1.00",
%%%     date            = "18 October 1991",
%%%     filename        = "j-hahn-errata.ltx",
%%%     address         = "Center for Scientific Computing
%%%                        Department of Mathematics
%%%                        South Physics Building
%%%                        University of Utah
%%%                        Salt Lake City, UT 84112
%%%                        USA
%%%                        Tel: (801) 581-5254
%%%                        FAX: (801) 581-4148",
%%%     checksum        = "50400 791 3328 26031",
%%%     email           = "beebe@magna.math.utah.edu (Internet)",
%%%     codetable       = "ISO/ASCII",
%%%     keywords        = "",
%%%     supported       = "yes",
%%%     docstring       = "This document contains comments and errata
%%%                        for the book ``\Latex{} for Everyone.''
%%%
%%%                        The checksum field above contains a CRC-16
%%%                        checksum as the first value, followed by the
%%%                        equivalent of the standard UNIX wc (word
%%%                        count) utility output of lines, words, and
%%%                        characters.  This is produced by Robert
%%%                        Solovay's checksum utility.",
%%%  }
%%% ====================================================================

\documentstyle[texnames,twocolumn,erratum]{article}

\pagestyle{myheadings}

\markright{{\rm Comments and Errata for {\em \LaTeX{} for
           Everyone} [18-Oct-1991]}}

\title{Comments and Errata for {\em \LaTeX{} for Everyone}}

\author{
        Nelson H. F. Beebe\\
        Center for Scientific Computing\\
        Department of Mathematics\\
        South Physics Building\\
        University of Utah\\
        Salt Lake City, UT 84112\\
        USA\\
        Tel: (801) 581-5254\\
        FAX: (801) 581-4148\\
        Email: {\tt beebe@math.utah.edu}
}

\date{Last update: [18-Oct-1991]\\
Version 1.00}

\begin{document}

% The first page needs a bit of extra interparagraph
% stretchability to avoid an underfull vbox occasioned by
% the use of the verbatim environment in the first column.
% Increase the glue to 2pt from 1pt.
\parskip 0pt plus 2pt

\maketitle

This document contains remarks and corrections to the book

\begin{verbatim}
@String{pub-PTI = "Personal {\TeX} Inc."}
@String{pub-PTI:adr = "12 Madrona Street,
             Mill Valley, CA 94941, USA"}

@Book{Hahn:LE91,
  author =       "Jane Hahn",
  title =        "{\LaTeX{}} for Everyone",
  publisher =    pub-PTI,
  year =         "1991",
  address =      pub-PTI:adr,
  OPTISBN =      "not yet available",
  pages =        "352",
  price =        "US\$19.95",
}
\end{verbatim}

Generally, I liked the book, and will use it in courses I
teach.  I wish that the final manuscript had been proofread
by several \LaTeX{} experts, since they could have
eliminated most of the 60+ errata noted below.

I was greatly disappointed to find no mention at all of the
\TeX{} Users Group.  As the 1991--92 President of that
organization, I must admit to a bias; nevertheless, I would
like to see future editions include at least the coverage of
Appendix J of the \TeX{}book.

I would also like to see an more extensive bibliography.
The contents of the file {\tt \verb|~|ftp\slash pub\slash
tex\slash bib\slash texbook1.\penalty0 bib} available on the
machine {\tt math.\penalty0 utah.\penalty0 edu} for
anonymous ftp, or obtainable via an e-mail request {\tt send
texbook1.bib from tex\slash bib} to {\tt tuglib@\penalty0
math.\penalty0 utah.\penalty0 edu} provides what I believe
is complete coverage of all published books about \TeX{},
plus several others on typography.

The text and bibliography should also include some coverage
of the important issues of typographic style and design.
The books by Jan V.~White in the above-cited bibliography,
plus Strunk and White's {\em The Elements of Style}, the
{\em Chicago Manual of Style}, and others cited on p.~207 of
the {\em \LaTeX{} User's Guide and Reference Manual} are
good starting points.

In the following errata summary, positive line number
references count from the top of the page, and negative ones
from the bottom of the page.  Page headers are not counted
in determining line counts, but section headings and other
displayed material are.

\begin{errata}

  \erritem{p. vi, l. -4}
        \erratum{
        Writing as Much s Possible
        }{
        Writing as Much as Possible
        }

  \erritem{p. 5, l. -8}
        It would be better to write {\em screen\/} or {\em
        display\/} instead of {\em computer terminal}.  The
        former is more widely applicable.  In many
        environments, terminals have gone the way of the
        card punch, having been replaced by networked
        personal computers and workstations.

  \erritem{p. 6, l. 6}
        {\em it requires that you give it ``\verb|.tex|''
          for an extension}

        This is untrue.  Other extensions are perfectly
        permissible, and in fact, many of us recommend using
        unique file extensions that differentiate between
        various \TeX{} macro packages: \verb|.ltx| for
        \LaTeX{} files, \verb|.stx| for \SLiTeX{},
        \verb|.atx| for \AMSTEX{}, and so on.

        The confusion on the part of the author probably
        arises from the case where {\em no\/} file extension
        is provided; in such a case, \TeX{} implementations
        will provide a {\em default\/} extension of
        \verb|.tex|.

  \erritem{p. 12, l. -1}
        \erratum{
        square braces
        }{
        square brackets
        }

  \erritem{p. 13, l. 1}
        {\em Arguments should be contiguous; i.e.\ there
        should not be spaces, \verb|<CR>|s or other
        characters between them.}

        This is not entirely correct.  Whitespace {\em is\/}
        permitted in some circumstances, although I think
        \LaTeX{} is somewhat inconsistent.  For example, it
        accepts
\begin{verbatim}
\documentstyle[twocolumn,
cite,     doublespace,12pt]{article%
}
\end{verbatim}
        but rejects
\begin{verbatim}
\documentstyle[twocolumn,
cite,            doublespace,
12pt]{article%
}
\end{verbatim}
         There is a definite problem with \verb|\cite|,
        where spaces are {\em not\/} permitted in the
        citation lists.  As a rule, one should try to fit
        things on one line, and if that is not possible, to
        use end-of-line comments to gobble following space.
        \LaTeX{} happily accepts
\begin{verbatim}
\documentstyle[%
               twocolumn,%
               cite,%
               doublespace,%
               12pt%
               ]{
               article%
               }
\end{verbatim}
        and some people prefer this style because it makes
        the options easier to see, and easier to temporarily
        suppress some of them just by inserting a leading
        percent on their line.

        I trust that the \LaTeX{} 3.0 project will remedy
        these idiosyncrasies.

  \erritem{p. 13, l. -9\ldots{}-1}
        I view the recommendation of using
        \verb*|\LaTeX\ | instead of \verb|\LaTeX{}| as {\em
        bad\/} practice, for the following reasons:
  \begin{itemize}
    \item
          If you terminate macro names with
          \verb*|\ | instead of with \verb|{}|,
          you have to remember to do that only
          where a space would really be
          permitted; in particular, you don't
          want the \verb*|\ | before
          punctuation. You can use \verb|{}|
          consistently in both cases.
    \item
          If the \verb*|\ | appears at
          the end of a line, and trailing
          spaces are subsequently stripped, you
          now have a new macro equivalent to
          \verb|\^^M|, which might have a
          different meaning.  Although both
          {\tt plain.tex} and
          {\tt lplain.tex} make the two macros
          equivalent, that might not always be
          the case.

          You should never count on end-of-line
          blanks being preserved; some e-mail
          systems, and some editors, may delete
          them.  Text filling and justification
          as commonly used in Emacs can also
          remove them.

    \item
          In composite words, like
          \verb|\TeX{}book|, the braces keep
          the parts together for text fill
          operations, word counting, spell
          checking and so forth, while the form
          \verb*|\TeX book| will not.
  \end{itemize}

The form \verb|{\TeX}| has the almost same
advantages over \verb*|\TeX\ | as \verb|\TeX{}|
does, but has one drawback: if you need to
\verb|\protect| it, then you must do so inside
the braces.  Use of a final empty brace pair
therefore seems the best choice.

  \erritem{p. 26, l. -5}
        \erratum{
          Anything between the ``\%'' and the end of the
          input line in your file is ignored completely by
          \LaTeX{}.
        }{
          Anything between the ``\%'' and the end of the
          input line in your file, {\em plus all leading
          whitespace on the next line}, is ignored
          completely by \LaTeX{}.
        }
          The point is a subtle one that every book on
          \TeX{} I've found so far fails to make adequately
          clear.  When \TeX{} sees an end-of-line, it
          switches to vertical mode, and leading space is
          ignored in vertical mode.  The reason the
          distinction is important is that indentation can
          therefore be used to make macros much more
          readable than they otherwise are, and numerous
          examples exist of unreadable macros that were
          jammed together to avoid generation of spurious
          whitespace in the output because their author did
          not understand this point.

          Although it is beyond the scope of this book, an
          even better approach for macro files is to change
          category codes to make whitespace be ignored; see
          {\em \TeX{} for the Impatient}, p.~281.

  \erritem{p. 29, s. 2.13}
          This section should also discuss the
          \verb+\verb*|...|+ command and the
          \verb|verbatim*| environment, which produce
          visible spaces.  There are circumstances where it
          is important to show the reader where spaces are.

  \erritem{p. 32, l. -7}
        \erratum{
        square braces
        }{
        square brackets
        }
        See also erratum {\em [p. 12, l. -1]}.

  \erritem{p. 37, l. 15}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
          There is nothing whatever about \LaTeX{} that
          restricts it to the IBM PC, and there is no need
          in this book to even mention that system.  All
          architecture-specific references should be
          expunged.

  \erritem{p. 41, s. 3.4}
          References to {\em Times Roman} are incorrect.
          While that may have been the author's intention
          when the manuscript was being written, the fonts
          used are in fact {\em Computer Modern}, which is a
          descendant of {\em Monotype Modern 8A}.

          While Times Roman is a well-known font, it is not
          usable with \TeX{} except with additional style
          files, device driver support, and output device
          support.  All \TeX{} installations can handle
          Computer Modern fonts.

  \erritem{p. 41, l. -1}
          The example {\tt \verb|\bf| powerful \verb|\rm|
          feeling} is very bad practice, and should {\em
          never\/} be shown in an introductory book.  You
          have to read ahead to p.~44 to learn how to do
          this correctly.  Groups should {\em always\/} be
          used for font changes, so that the text inside
          them can remain ignorant of the surrounding font.
          When you proceed as shown in the book, you are
          making an unwarranted assumption about the
          prevailing font in the text.

  \erritem{p. 54, l. 16}
        \erratum{
          {\tt (\bs chapter\{Here I Go!\})}
        }{
          {\tt \bs chapter\{Here I Go!\}}
        }

  \erritem{p. 55, l. 17}
          The text should note that \LaTeX{} always warns
          you if cross-references are possibly incorrect.

  \erritem{p. 61, l. -1}
          {\em input files must have the extension
          \verb|.tex|}.

          This is {\em incorrect}.  See the discussion above
          about erratum {\em [p. 6, l. 6]}.

  \erritem{p. 71, l. -8}
        \erratum{
          illegal.
        }{
          {\em illegal}.
        }

          This point is definitely worth
          emphasizing; it is a common
          source of error.

  \erritem{p. 72, l. 10}
          {\em (Don't enter the line in parentheses.)}

          The usage here is confusing (see the remarks at
          erratum {\em [p. 54, l. 16]\/}).  I would suggest
          rewording it to say something like {\em Put the
          \verb|\label| command in your first displayed
          equation of the previous exercise immediately
          before the \verb|\end{equation}|}:

\begin{verbatim}
\label{eq:first}
\end{equation}
\end{verbatim}

  \erritem{p. 78, l. -11}
        \erratum{
           One followed by anything other than a space
          produces this symbol.
        }{
           A query followed by a grave accent produces the
          symbol {\tt ?`}, a Spanish leading query.  A query
          followed by any other character produces itself
          and that character.
        }

  \erritem{p. 79, l. -8}
        \erratum{
          {\tt (\bs begin\{document\})}
        }{
          {\tt \bs begin\{document\}}
        }
          Eliminate the confusing parentheses here; see the
          remark above at errata {\em [p. 54, l. 16]} and
          {\em [p. 72, l.  10]}.

  \erritem{p. 87, l. -5}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
        See erratum {\em [p. 37, l. 15]\/} above.

  \erritem{p.115, l. 12}
          I found the use of \verb|\&| in this example
          confusing, because the reader is left wondering
          whether \verb|\&| is a magical command for the
          \verb|\multicolumn| command.  I think it would be
          better to use \verb|and| instead, or to make a
          remark in the text that \verb|\&| is used to get a
          literal ampersand into the text.

  \erritem{p. 118, l. 1\ldots{}4}
          Rather than recommend the use of wide
          \verb|p|-columns to avoid excessive hyphenation,
          and large gaps between words, I think it would be
          better to introduce the \verb|\raggedright|
          declaration at this point.  That control sequence
          is not otherwise treated elsewhere in the book,
          and this is a good application of it.

  \erritem{p. 125, l. -3}
        \erratum{
        the information under {\bf PAGES} is really
        }{
        the information under {\bf Pages} is really
        }

  \erritem{p. 136, l. 5}
        \erratum{
          again an notice
        }{
          again and notice
        }

  \erritem{p. 137, l. -7\ldots{}-1}
          It would be better in this example to have used a
          \verb|\begin{table}[p]| environment;
          \verb|\clearpage| is almost always a bad thing,
          because subsequent changes in the text can require
          that it be moved to reoptimize the page breaking.

  \erritem{p. 139, l. 8}
        \erratum{
          thinks a page too full.
        }{
          thinks a page is too full.
        }

  \erritem{p. 140, l. 14}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
        See errata {\em [p. 37, l. 15]\/} and {\em [p. 87,
          l. -5]\/} above.

  \erritem{p. 164}
          The description of all of these parameters would
          be greatly helped by a figure such as that given
          in D. Buerger's {\em \LaTeX{} for Engineers and
          Scientists}, pp.~74--75, which were produced from
          the {\tt layout.\-tex} file written by Nelson H.
          F. Beebe, and available in many \TeX{} archives.
          The file is in the public domain, and may be
          freely used and adapted by authors; a credit will
          be appreciated.

  \erritem{p. 169, l. -10}
        \erratum{
          after the text refers
        }{
          after the text that refers
        }

          {\em \LaTeX{} places a floating object (or float)
          as soon as possible after the text refers to
          it---if not on the same page, on the following
          page.}

          I wish this were true, but it is {\em not}.  Float
          placement is one of the weak areas of \LaTeX{}
          2.09 which the \LaTeX{} 3.0 redesign is
          addressing.  Floats often move to the end of the
          current section or chapter, which is highly
          unsatisfactory.  Although \verb|\clearpage| will
          force them out, there is no analogous
          \verb|\clearfloats| to force them out {\em
          without\/} starting a new page.

  \erritem{p. 171, l. 14}
        \erratum{
          preference is {\tt [bthp]}.
        }{
          preference is {\tt [tbp]}.
        }
          See the {\em \LaTeX{} User's Guide and Reference
          Manual}, p.~176.

  \erritem{p. 176, l. 4}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
          See errata {\em [p. 37, l. 15]}, {\em [p.
          87, l. -5]}, {\em [p. 140, l. 14]}, and
          {\em [p. 176, l. 4]\/}
          above.

  \erritem{p. 189, l. 4}
        \erratum{
          {\tt \bs begin-}
        }{
          {\tt \bs begin\{document\}}
        }
          Use of the hyphen here is confusing.

  \erritem{p. 189, l. -1}
        \erratum{
          {\tt \bs begin}
        }{
          {\tt \bs begin\{document\}}
        }
        Omission of the \verb|{document}| is confusing.

  \erritem{p. 190, l. 14}
        \erratum{
          {\tt \bs begin}
        }{
          {\tt \bs begin\{document\}}
        }
        Omission of the \verb|{document}| is confusing.

  \erritem{p. 191, l. -1}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
          See errata {\em [p. 37, l. 15]}, {\em
          [p. 87, l. -5]},
          {\em [p. 140, l. 14]\/} and {\em [p.
          176, l. 4]\/} above.

  \erritem{p. 192, s. 192}
        The text should describe \verb|makeindex|.  Indexes
        are much too complex to do by hand except in trivial
        cases, and support software is essential.

  \erritem{p. 197, l. -12}
        \erratum{
        DOS prompt.
        }{
        computer's prompt.
        }
          See errata {\em [p. 37, l. 15]}, {\em [p. 87, l.
        -5]}, {\em [p. 140, l. 14]}, {\em [p. 176, l. 4]},
        and {\em [p. 191, l. -1]\/} above.

  \erritem{p. 198, l. 1}
          This section should discuss \BibTeX{}!
        Bibliographies are much too complex to consider
        doing by hand except in trivial cases.  \BibTeX{} is
        easy to use, and can generate bibliographies in a
        variety of formats.

  \erritem{p. 201, l. -7, -1}
        \erratum{
          etcetera
        }{
          etc. {\em or\/} et cetera
        }
          It is very unusual to use the full phrase; if you
          do, remember that it is {\em two} Latin words
          meaning {\em and other things}.

  \erritem{p. 204, l. 7\ldots{}8}
          The use of \verb*|\ | here should be replaced by
          an empty brace pair, \verb|{}|.  See the
          discussion above under erratum {\em [p. 13, l.
          -9\ldots{}-1]}.

  \erritem{p. 205, l. 5\ldots{}9}
          Use of abbreviations like this is a {\em bad\/}
          idea and should not be introduced in a textbook.
          A decent text editor can help you get these long
          sequences without a lot of pain, and without
          having to introduce abbreviations into the
          document that make it hard for others to read!  I
          know that the {\em \LaTeX{} User's Guide and
          Reference Manual\/} does this too on p.~55; it is
          a bad idea there as well!

  \erritem{p. 209, l. 4}
          The line {\em and the command\ldots{}} is missing
          a \verb|\noindent| in the input manuscript file.

  \erritem{p. 209, l. 11}
        \erratum{
          the file {\tt latex.\-tex}
        }{
          the files {\tt latex.\-tex} et al
        }
          There are many other files that are relevant here,
          including {\tt lplain.tex}, {\tt lfonts.tex}, and
          all of the {\tt *.doc} and {\tt *.sty} files.

  \erritem{p. 211, l. -11}
        \erratum{
          et cetera
        }{
          etc.
        }
          See also erratum {\em [p. 201, l. -7, -1]\/}; the
          text is inconsistent in this usage, and there may
          well be others that I did not spot; a computer
          search of the input files should resolve the
          problem.

  \erritem{p. 224, l. -13}
        \erratum{
         the default of 12 points is used.
        }{
         the default of 10 points is used.
        }

  \erritem{p. 225}
          This table would be {\em much\/} easier to use if
          it were sorted alphabetically by parameter name.

  \erritem{p. 226}
          This table would be {\em much\/} easier to use if
          it were sorted alphabetically by parameter name.

  \erritem{pp. 227--238}
          This section would be {\em much\/} easier to use
          if it were sorted alphabetically by parameter name
          within each subsection.

  \erritem{p. 230, l. 4}
          {\em \verb|\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}|
          would create double spacing.}

          This is not strictly true, although it would be
          nice if it were the case.  Correct double spacing
          takes more effort; see the {\tt doublespace.\-sty}
          file included in many \TeX{} distributions.

  \erritem{p. 230, l. -8}
        \erratum{
          {\tt \bs setcounter\{secnumdepth\}\{3\}}
          Subsections and above
        }{
          {\tt \bs setcounter\{secnumdepth\}\{3\}}
          Subsubsections and above
        }

  \erritem{p. 250, l. -8}
        \erratum{
          line slopes to chose from.
        }{
          line slopes to choose from.
        }

  \erritem{p. 263, l. 11}
        \erratum{
        Writing as Much s Possible
        }{
        Writing as Much as Possible
        }

  \erritem{p. 266, l. 5}
        \erratum{
          pound sign
        }{
          {\em sharp sign} or {\em hash mark}
        }
        For many people in the English-speaking world, a
        pound sign is \pounds.  Use either of the suggested
        phrases for an international audience.

  \erritem{p. 270, l. -3}
        \erratum{
          DOS {\tt print}
        }{
          {\tt print}
        }
        Expunge references to DOS\@. See errata {\em [p. 37,
        l. 15]}, {\em [p. 87, l. -5]}, {\em [p. 140, l.
        14]}, {\em [p. 176, l. 4]}, {\em [p. 191, l. -1]\/}
        and {\em [p. 197, l. -12]} above.

  \erritem{p. 285, l. 10}
        \erratum{
         print a page 30.
        }{
         print page 30.
        }

  \erritem{p. 300, l. 14}
          The line {\em and the result\ldots{}} is missing a
          \verb|\noindent| in the input manuscript file.

  \erritem{p. 301, l. -10, -8}
        \verb|\quad| is not defined in the text.

  \erritem{p. 307, l. 1}
        The runner header is too long, and overlaps the page
        number.

  \erritem{p. 308, l. -14, -11}
          Correct double spacing takes more effort; see the
        {\tt doublespace.\-sty} file included in many \TeX{}
        distributions.  See also erratum {\em [p. 230, l.
        4]}.

  \erritem{p. 309, l. -5}
        \verb|\raggedright| is not defined in the text, but
        should be.  See erratum {\em [p. 118, l.
        1\ldots{}4]}.

  \erritem{p. 310, l. 1, 6}
        \erratum{
           {\tt \bs hsize}
        }{
           {\tt \bs linewidth}
        }
        \verb|\hsize| should not be discussed in a \LaTeX{}
        book.  The correct value is \verb|\linewidth|, which
        tracks the current indentation and column;
        \verb|\textwidth| refers to the full page width, and
        thus in most cases is {\em not\/} what you want to
        use.

  \erritem{p. 311, l. -9}
        \erratum{
          like a rule with a 0-inch height
        }{
          like a rule with a 0-pt height, or an empty box,
          {\tt \bs mbox\{\}}
        }
        \LaTeX{} is international; regional units like
        inches should be avoided.  Only the USA, alone of
        all the countries in the world, still uses them.  An
        empty box is usually more obvious for the purposes
        discussed here.

  \erritem{p. 313, l. -5, p. 314, l. 5}
          These are bad examples of making a captioned
        table; a page break could appear between the heading
        and the following tabular environment.  The best way
        to do this is to use the \verb|table| environment,
        which prevents such surprises.

  \erritem{p. 319, l. -8}
        \erratum{
          et cetera
        }{
          etc.
        }
          See also errata {\em [p. 201, l. -7, -1]\/} and
        {\em [p.  211, l. -11]}.

  \erritem{p. 345, l. -12}
        \erratum{
          Times Roman
        }{
          Computer Modern
        }
        See also erratum {\em [p. 41, s. 3.4]}.

\end{errata}

\end{document}
% This is for GNU Emacs:
% Local Variables:
% fill-column: 60
% End: