Entry Gustafson:1998:CVF from ieeecomputscieng.bib

Last update: Fri Mar 2 02:05:28 MST 2018                Valid HTML 3.2!

Index sections

Top | Symbols | Numbers | Math | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

BibTeX entry

@Article{Gustafson:1998:CVF,
  author =       "John Gustafson",
  title =        "Computational Verifiability and Feasibility of the
                 {ASCI} Program",
  journal =      j-IEEE-COMPUT-SCI-ENG,
  volume =       "5",
  number =       "1",
  pages =        "36--45",
  month =        jan # "\slash " # mar,
  year =         "1998",
  CODEN =        "ISCEE4",
  DOI =          "https://doi.org/10.1109/99.660304",
  ISSN =         "1070-9924 (print), 1558-190X (electronic)",
  ISSN-L =       "1070-9924",
  bibdate =      "Sat Jan 9 08:57:23 MST 1999",
  bibsource =    "http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/ieeecomputscieng.bib",
  note =         "Discusses recent progress in interval arithmetic and
                 its relevance to error estimation in very large
                 computations of the type envisioned for the US ASCI
                 (Advanced Strategic Computing Initiative) project.",
  URL =          "http://dlib.computer.org/cs/books/cs1998/pdf/c1036.pdf;
                 http://www.computer.org/cse/cs1998/c1036abs.htm",
  abstract =     "The Advanced Strategic Computing Initiative aims to
                 replace physical nuclear-weapons testing with computer
                 simulations. This focuses much-needed attention on an
                 issue common to all Grand Challenge computation
                 programs: How do you get confidence, as opposed to mere
                 guidance or suggestion, out of a computer simulation?
                 Making the simulation of some physical phenomena
                 rigorous and immune to the usual discretization and
                 rounding errors is computationally expensive and
                 practiced by a vanishing, small fraction of the HPCC
                 community. Some of ASCI's proposed computing power
                 should be placed not into brute-force increases in
                 particle counts, mesh densities, or finer time steps,
                 but into methods that increase confidence in the
                 answers it produces. This will place the debate over
                 ASCI's validity on scientific instead of political
                 grounds.",
  acknowledgement = ack-nhfb,
  fjournal =     "IEEE Computational Science \& Engineering",
  journal-URL =  "http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=99",
}

Related entries