Entry Linthicum:1995:CCD from opencomp.bib
Last update: Wed Nov 9 16:25:04 MST 2011
Top |
Numbers |
Math |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z
BibTeX entry
@Article{Linthicum:1995:CCD,
author = "David S. Linthicum",
title = "{Chasing Compound Document Standards}",
journal = j-OPEN-COMPUTING,
volume = "12",
number = "1",
pages = "55--??",
month = jan,
year = "1995",
CODEN = "OPCOEB",
ISSN = "1078-2370",
bibdate = "Fri Jan 26 17:24:01 MST 1996",
abstract = "It's Microsoft's OLE vs. IBM's/Apple's/Novell's
OpenDoc. Which will develop the best compound
documents?",
acknowledgement = ack-nhfb,
}
Related entries
- best,
8(9)91,
8(10)85,
9(1)55,
10(1)46,
10(2)59,
12(3)73,
12(5)46
- develop,
9(11)65,
12(9)53
- document,
8(12)81,
12(1)102,
12(2)57
- Linthicum, David S.,
11(9)67,
11(11)67,
11(12)84,
12(2)68,
12(7)66
- Microsoft,
8(9)105,
8(10)101,
8(11)99,
9(3)71,
9(9)41,
10(2)42,
10(2)47,
10(2)53,
10(3)42,
11(9)21,
11(11)35,
12(2)15,
12(3)15,
12(4)76,
12(7)62,
12(7)62-1,
12(11)48
- OLE,
12(8)54
- standard,
8(10)79,
8(10)85,
8(11)111,
9(8)89,
9(9)95,
9(10)55,
9(10)73,
9(10)97,
9(11)99,
10(1)39,
10(2)29,
10(3)29,
10(3)111,
11(11)67,
12(2)52,
12(2)68,
12(3)65,
12(5)65,
12(12)52
- vs.,
11(12)72,
12(2)15,
12(4)15,
12(6)54,
12(8)64
- which,
8(11)83,
9(8)48,
9(10)48,
9(11)81,
10(2)99,
11(11)105,
12(1)100,
12(5)30,
12(12)50
- will,
8(9)72,
8(9)79,
9(1)72,
9(2)53,
9(3)41,
9(3)65,
9(7)55,
9(8)13,
10(1)57,
10(3)11,
10(3)42,
11(9)42,
11(9)83,
11(10)29,
11(11)58,
11(11)75,
11(12)29,
12(1)102,
12(2)15,
12(2)46,
12(3)42,
12(3)65,
12(3)73,
12(4)72,
12(4)76,
12(7)15,
12(7)62,
12(8)54,
12(10)72,
12(10)74,
12(11)46