Entry vandenBergen:1997:ECD from jgraphtools.bib

Last update: Sun Oct 15 02:29:44 MDT 2017                Valid HTML 3.2!

Index sections

Top | Symbols | Math | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

BibTeX entry

@Article{vandenBergen:1997:ECD,
  author =       "Gino van den Bergen",
  title =        "Efficient Collision Detection of Complex Deformable
                 Models using {AABB} Trees",
  journal =      j-J-GRAPHICS-TOOLS,
  volume =       "2",
  number =       "4",
  pages =        "1--14",
  year =         "1997",
  CODEN =        "JGTOFD",
  ISSN =         "1086-7651",
  ISSN-L =       "1086-7651",
  bibdate =      "Thu Oct 12 17:08:13 2000",
  bibsource =    "http://www.acm.org/jgt/issues.html;
                 http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/jgraphtools.bib",
  URL =          "http://www.acm.org/jgt/papers/vanDenBergen97/",
  abstract =     "We present a scheme for exact collision detection
                 between complex models undergoing rigid motion and
                 deformation. The scheme relies on a hierarchical model
                 representation using axis-aligned bounding boxes
                 (AABBs). Recent work has shown that AABB trees are
                 slower than oriented bounding box (OBB) trees for
                 performing overlap tests. In this paper, we describe a
                 way to speed up overlap tests between AABBs, such that
                 for collision detection of rigid models, the difference
                 in performance between the two representations is
                 greatly reduced. Furthermore, we show how to update an
                 AABB tree quickly as a model is deformed. We thus find
                 AABB trees to be the method of choice for collision
                 detection of complex models undergoing deformation. In
                 fact, because they are not much slower to test, are
                 faster to build, and use less storage than OBB trees,
                 AABB trees might be a reasonable choice for rigid
                 models as well.",
  acknowledgement = ack-nhfb,
  journal-URL =  "http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujgt20",
}

Related entries