Entry Knox:1999:PRP from sigcse1990.bib

Last update: Wed Sep 26 02:07:32 MDT 2018                Valid HTML 4.0!

Index sections

Top | Symbols | Numbers | Math | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

BibTeX entry

@Article{Knox:1999:PRP,
  author =       "Deborah Knox and Sally Fincher and Nell Dale and
                 Elizabeth Adams and Don Goelman and James Hightower and
                 Ken Loose and Fred Springsteel",
  title =        "The Peer Review Process of Teaching Materials: Report
                 of the {ITiCSE'99 Working Group on Validation of the
                 Quality of Teaching Materials}",
  journal =      j-SIGCSE,
  volume =       "31",
  number =       "4",
  pages =        "87--100",
  month =        dec,
  year =         "1999",
  CODEN =        "SIGSD3",
  DOI =          "https://doi.org/10.1145/349522.571915",
  ISSN =         "0097-8418 (print), 2331-3927 (electronic)",
  ISSN-L =       "0097-8418",
  bibdate =      "Sat Nov 17 16:56:41 MST 2012",
  bibsource =    "http://portal.acm.org/;
                 http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/sigcse1990.bib",
  URL =          "ftp://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/mirrors/ftp.ira.uka.de/bibliography/Techreports/UKent.bib;
                 http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1999/962",
  abstract =     "When an instructor adopts teaching materials, he/she
                 wants some measure of confidence that the resource is
                 effective, correct, and robust. The measurement of the
                 quality of a resource is an open problem. It is our
                 thesis that the traditional evaluative approach to peer
                 review is not appropriate to insure the quality of
                 teaching materials, which are created with different
                 contextual constraints. This Working Group report
                 focuses on the evaluation process by detailing a
                 variety of review models. The evolution of the
                 development and review of teaching materials is
                 outlined and the contexts for creation, assessment, and
                 transfer are discussed. We present an empirical study
                 of evaluation forms conducted at the ITiCSE 99
                 conference, and recommend at least one new review model
                 for the validation of the quality of teaching
                 resources.",
  acknowledgement = ack-nhfb,
  fjournal =     "SIGCSE Bulletin (ACM Special Interest Group on
                 Computer Science Education)",
  journal-URL =  "http://portal.acm.org/browse_dl.cfm?idx=J688",
  submission-id = "26200_949424067",
}

Related entries